Naturally, when delivering peer programs, we never want to cause negative consequences for involved members. When asking people questions about programs, we also do not want to cause any nature of harm to the people answering the questions (unintended or otherwise). It is therefore important to reflect deeply, prior to commencing your evidence gathering process, about whether there is any potential of adverse effects for those being asked questions. Harm can be both physical and/or psychological. It could take various forms. These could range from, stress and anxiety, diminished self-esteem and self-worth, or a reduced sense of privacy. Each question should be thought about mindfully to avoid any such risks. For example, rather than asking ‘‘Were you lonely before you joined the peer group?’ it would be safer to ask, ‘What are the benefits of being a peer group member?’. Even if the information gathered is less ‘strong’ or less ‘compelling’, the safety of those being asked is paramount. Your information collection should never cause harm to the people you are asking questions of.